//@报纸观察: 情何以堪！！！？？？
//@雾海-危岩: //@平和致中2010://@张华志V: 转发微博
//@安家刘文斌:王Sir嘻笑怒骂皆成文章。好油菜尔！新浪微博社區管理中心舉報處理大廳，歡迎查看！
(7分鐘前) |
http://paper.wenweipo.com/2010/09/08/FI1009080024.htm
|
火灾后，袁厉害因突发高血压病倒住院，一度陷入昏迷 
袁厉害 
：【《厉害女士》全文】以下长微博是《厉害女士》报道全文。报道中提及的关键事实是通过对核心当事人（包括袁厉害本人）暗访得来，并通过多信源交叉印证，有完整证据链支撑。文中提及信息所涉及的相关证据，本刊已作妥善保存。 
转载▼
反對歧視，從反思自己對不同群體的偏見開始。
我不是王婆买瓜！//@廖洪涛微博: 还有《香港商报》，《大公报》和《新晚报》也是同类！这些报纸别说在香港零售没有人要，摆在住宅楼的大堂也免费送，但没有多少人要！//@石扉客: 附议
砸日系车，也是这样鼓动起来的。即使能把日本人彻底打死，中国出了口恶气，但对我们未必有利啊。世界上靠拳头打下天下的，可能会招来更多的敌人。以美国人曾经的强大，到现在也有点支撑不住了，教训深刻。我期待中国和平发展，但二十一世纪应该是世界的世纪，而不能仅仅是中国的
】我们是引用的上海市政府新闻办公室官方微博@上海发布 的消息：“截止3月12日15时，全市共打捞死猪5916具”。
@薛蛮子 @袁裕来律师@老徐时评 @五岳散人 @焦点联播 @何兵 中国人转起来！
北京晚报 发表于2013-03-16 17:10
//很担心：如果相关问题，甚至谁可能被点名提问，都是新总理事先知道的，那就更麻烦了？//@madmadmadmad : “总理开始说人话，记者却不会说人话了。”
#反钓鱼防欺诈#是时候和虚假中奖说再见了。查看详情！
/@真老顽童: 柴静做的根本不是“新闻”！ (9分鐘前) (19分鐘前)
//@韩志HZ: 权威媒体发布如此不靠谱数据信息，很失水准吧。
//@文怡: 哈哈哈哈哈，我终于理解为嘛微博上老有人说吐槽无力了
//@每周评论:转发微博
#随手拍#活动开始啦！5000万巨奖、10万个中奖机会等你来
本报评论员晓宇
人们纯净的生活，早已被打破，不是因为青春，而是因为浮躁。
生活方式的浮躁加剧了道德的失范，道德的失范又加速让生活失去重量。如此循环，让困于是非中的人们，总是囿于眼前，走不出几步，就愈发地艰难与失范。5月13日，媒体曝出“海南万宁某小学校长带4学生开房一中年男子带另2学生开房”的消息，新闻让人震惊，小学校长带自己学校里的6名幼女与另一成年男子分别开房，非但践踏师道尊严，亦突破人伦底线，无论是出于利益或其他目的，此等行为，必被法律严惩，必被社会唾弃。
亦因此，父母家长之说，一度取得了控诉之效：一名女学生的父亲讲述，6名女孩是同一年级的，他女儿与一起被带到海口的4人中，是被同一名女孩带出来的，“这个女孩认校长陈某当了干爹”，陈某就是通过该女孩，以带她们到海口玩，为她们买衣服为由，将4名女孩带走。而另一名女生家长说，“我女儿是被冯某带走的，与女儿一起的学生，曾认冯某为干爹”，“女儿说，冯某为她买了衣服、高跟鞋、日常用品等，还出了居住房屋的费用。在之前还给了她现金，让她坐车到度假山庄”。
陈某是万宁市第二小学校长，冯某是万宁市房管局工作人员，两人都是上述事件中的主角。近年来，性侵幼女的事件，时常冲击公众的眼球，此类事件，令人发指有之，但若说令公众有多少陌生感与惶惶然则未必，在愤怒过后的第二日，权威媒体曝出监控视频及警方调查显示：这6名小学生中，有5人就读同一所小学的6年级。还有1人在其他小学读6年级。5月8号中午6名女生在一起，其中一名女生叫来了她熟悉的另外一所小学的陈姓校长，想让校长开车送她们去海口。校长没有同意，给她们1000元离开了。当天晚上，这6名女生在一家茶馆喝茶到晚上9点，又叫来这名校长到KTV唱歌喝酒。其间，有两名女生不愿意再唱歌，就自己联系当地一名政府单位冯姓工作人员。随后此人驾车将两人带到一处旅馆开房。另外4名女生，在KTV里一直与陈姓校长唱歌到9号凌晨，然后在旁边的酒店里，要了两个房间过夜。
如此少年维特的烦恼在先，6名女生的出走，似乎并不干陈姓校长与冯姓工作人员什么事。而经万宁市公安局法医鉴定，犯罪嫌疑人并未与6名女生发生性行为。万宁警方已请求海南省公安厅法医对受害女生再次进行鉴定。警方介绍，与陈某同处房间的一女生说，在房间内陈某对其进行搂抱等亲密行为。与冯某同处房间的女生则否认冯某与二人有过亲密行为。
面对如此事实，这又大大出乎公众的意料了。本来公众已不惮以最大的恶意来揣摸陈某与冯某的为人了，的确，在明知对方为未成年少女的情况下，仍然与之开房并在同一房间过夜，生活举止之轻浮，难辞其咎，师德道德之失范亦昭然若揭，警方对两人是否有猥亵行为的调查，十分必要和正当。但在反思此两人生活失范的同时，对于6名女生的生活方式是不是也应该有反思？作为未成年少女，与成年男子交往密切，并且还认了“干爹”，小小年纪，接受对方所赠“衣服、高跟鞋”，还在外租房，平时父母学校对此就毫无知觉？并不加管教干涉？在开房事件中，6名女生主动叫成年男子来买单并唱歌喝酒，随同开房，在视频之中，穿着举止已不似小学女生之仪态，在公众与家长众口一词指责校长与政府工作人员时，岂不应对这些女生的生活方式，以及此前对她们的教育进行反思？
对此6名小学女生的教育早已失责，而此6名小学女生的生活方式也早已失范，这才是今日特别出人意料，并须引起特别重视与警惕的。
http://epaper.xxcb.cn/xxcba/html/2013-05/15/content_2707868.htm
(12分鐘前) 檢舉| 回覆 
(转)@作家崔成浩 @袁裕来律师 @徐昕 
The American news business is living through revolutionary times. For The New York Times, which I joined six months ago, it means catapulting the Grey Lady into a world very different from the one in which she spent her first century and a half: multimedia, multi-platform, multi pretty much everything.There are some things we’re not going to take risks with. The quality, authority and accuracy of our journalism. Our values, including the time-honoured but still vital tradition of keeping our journalism independent from the commercial interests of the company. In the age of so-called ‘native’ advertising in which the boundary between editorial and commercial content is more and more frequently blurred, that tradition of maintaining a clear line between the journalism and the business of The New York Times is more important than ever.But we will not secure the future of The Times without the kind of bold innovation – in products and services, in
business-model – which is intrinsically and necessarily risky. Two years ago The Times launched a new digital pay model, essentially asking users of The Times on digital to do what more than a million print users of the newspaper were already doing, which is to pay a regular subscription in return
for extensive access to our journalism.The consensus among the experts was that it wouldn’t work, was foolhardy in fact and not needed. People just weren’t prepared to pay for high quality content on the internet and, besides, wasn’t digital advertising enough – wouldn’t it grow until, just as with print advertising in the golden age of physical newspapers, it alone was enough to support America’s newsrooms?In fact the launch of the pay model is the most important and most successful business decision made by The New York Times in many years. We have around 700,000 paid digital subscribers across the company’s products so far and a new nine-figure revenue-stream which is still growing. Much of the rest of the US newspaper industry is now following suit. And developing this pay model, launching a suite of new subscription products to attract additional new subscribers, is central to our plans for the futureWhat’s interesting, though, was that initial widespread skepticism. It won’t work. It’s mad. They’re barking up the
wrong tree.In many ways, the thing that gets disrupted in a disruptive age is the conventional wisdom. Wherever you end up, in this country or abroad, starting your own business or joining an established company large or small, you’ll bump into conventional wisdom and all the apparently excellent advice that flows from it. But the definition of a disruptive age is one in which the discontinuities outnumber and overwhelm the continuities and in which predictions based on the past or the smooth projection of current trends into the future frequently prove unsound. Conventional wisdom tries valiantly to keep up, to recalibrate in the light of recent developments, but because it cannot foresee transformational breakthroughs or the kind of behavioral and business-model pivots which digital technology makes possible, it never can.Take my industry. The movies are finished. TV advertising is dead. Exactly what happened to music will happen to TV. Nobody wants news anymore. No one will ever pay for anything on the internet. Not just said, but said widely and widely believed. And – for the most part and within the time horizon which the prophets themselves were suggesting – just plain wrong.All of the strategically successful things I’ve been involved in – whether a set of new TV channels or developing the BBC’s digital on-demand service, the i-Player – have had this thing in common: that, at the point of launch, pretty much everyone not involved in the project has agreed that it was going to be a total disaster. In modern media, you could make the case that the best way forward is to listen carefully to what the industry has to say and then do the exact opposite.
//@漠烟漠雨:The penis looks being punching into the sky//@许子杰微博: The penis looks so hard .//@jlijames: hard
//@中年格瓦拉: 再轉一次試試看//@沈步摇的爹: 一转眼就被删除了。
#随手拍#活动开始啦！5000万巨奖、10万个中奖机会等你来
| 欢迎光临 传媒教育网 (http://47.106.15.148/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |
放大圖片